With courts recognising informal documents such as notes, emails, letters, video as having legal standing, another key aspect to think about carefully is what to include in post-mortem messages intended for next of kin, family or friends. Even if your intent is good, by leaving a personal message you may raise a recipient’s expectations or sense of entitlement relating to an inheritance and risk the potential of your estate instructions being questioned after death.
Darryl Browne, Solicitor at Browne-Linkenbagh explains that there has been a 60 per cent increase in claims over the last decade in Australia largely initiated by people who have been acknowledged within informal documentation by a deceased party which has later been used to contest the deceased person’s will.
In the UK also, claims for mis-handling a deceased person’s estate has tripled in a year, the result of inadequate safe guards put in place as people rely more and more on DIY wills and informal estate planning measures.
“When you make declarations that are wrong, that overly inflate a person’s worth to you or are inflammatory when recording last wishes, it can be counterproductive,” says Browne. “If a will is contested, claims will take two or more years to be resolved and can have significant emotional, legal and financial implications for the intended beneficiaries of your estate.”
If a person is thinking about planning post-mortem messages to leave words of comfort or communicate last thoughts to friends and family, it’s important to think about how these might be read and interpreted by the recipients. Legal complications may follow and the awarding of a deceased’s estate may be contested if:
- Messages are inflammatory in nature
- They include explanation as to why someone received or didn’t receive an inheritance from their estate
- They imply in some way that the recipient is or should be a beneficiary – whether directly or indirectly
Legal advisers recommend that messages of an inflammatory nature are not included in wills or documents relating to how inheritance is to be awarded. Browne highlights the recent example of a man who stated that no provisions were to be made to his wife in his will giving reasons such as the marriage had broken down irretrievably and that they had been living separately for twenty years. However, it was his added description “and she is a compulsive and addicted gambler” that his wife took objection to inciting her to bring a case to the Supreme Court of South Australia to have these words removed. She lost but the intended beneficiaries were impacted by the emotional and financial fall out while the case was reviewed and the awarding of the estate was held back.
Kay Lam-McLeod, IT Lawyer from IdeaLaw would counsel against leaving a message that would stir up anger or resentment. “That’s only going to make it more likely that your will would be challenged,” she points out. “Remember that if your will is challenged, the estate will get hit with legal fees and it holds up distribution. So the people you want to leave your inheritance to are the ones who will suffer as a result.”
Similarly, when someone points out in a message, will, informal document or message that a friend, relative or partner is significant in their life, that person may later have a reasonable expectation of inheritance. In the case of Skarica v. Toska, a partner of a deceased woman was awarded a share of her estate even though she had specified he shouldn’t because she had simultaneously indicated in her will that he was someone important in her life.
So what steps are recommended to avoid raising legal issues down the track?
Browne suggests the following:
- Think about digital afterlife message leaving as part of an overall estate planning program. Leaving aside the legal ramifications, casual, unconsidered messages can have negative emotional consequences, even if not intended.
- When making a will and considering estate planning, meet with a legal representative to discuss who could bring a claim against your estate after you’ve died. Plan your communications to take into account these future scenarios, even if you don’t like to think in this way.
- While short messages to beneficiaries can be included in a will, if you wanted to leave a more lengthy message that acknowledged someone in particular or offer clarification/explanation for a decision or award that you are making, make sure that this is drafted with a legal representative or a Justice of Peace as part of carefully prepared statement.
- This kind of representative will ask for supporting evidence and instances to back up any statements you make, which will make your statement more likely to stand up to scrutiny in the event of any legal contestation.
- Avoid inflammatory or inaccurate remarks that may bring about legal action that beneficiaries will have to deal with.
- Ensure any messages are accurate and supported by facts; avoid overly inflating a person’s importance in your life. If you feel a person is so important to you, why not recognise them in your will?
Lam-McLeod offers some final words. “Have a will drafted up properly by a lawyer. The messages you leave will not be a replacement for a proper will.” She adds, “Then talk to your loved ones before you die. The most important messages are ones that should be said in person, not left for someone to find later.”
Any additional thoughts on how to leave post-mortem messages for loved ones? As ever, drop your comments below.